British newspapers debate Israeli settlements, Sudan's migration crisis, and Trump

British newspapers publish commentary on Israeli settlements policy, Sudan's civil war driving migration, and US-UK relations under Trump.

By Middle East Affairs
September 7, 2026
A hillside settlement with multiple multi-story residential buildings, both older and newer construction, arranged on tiered terrain with a partially paved road running along the base.
An Israeli settlement in the West Bank, photographed from a distance showing the densely built residential area situated on elevated terrain overlooking surrounding areas. (BBC Arabic)
2 min read
Text size

The Guardian published commentary arguing that Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband's agreement to impose a trade ban on Israeli settlements he had classified as illegal under international law came too late and is insufficient. The newspaper said Britain should prohibit its companies from contributing to settlement activity through financing, construction, insurance, or advertising in territory Britain considers illegally occupied.

The Guardian argued that Britain can no longer ignore violence and pressure from the Israeli government, military, and settlers against Palestinians in the West Bank. The newspaper noted that angry responses from some Israeli ministers threatening retaliatory measures in response to British sanctions are disappointing but unsurprising, and pointed to similar steps taken by European countries including Spain, Norway, and European Union member states.

The Daily Express foreign affairs editor Costantino Bitsarakis warned that Sudan's civil war, occurring thousands of miles from Britain, is increasingly having consequences for British shores. According to the British Home Office figures cited by the newspaper, more than 4,300 people from Sudan arrived in Britain by small boat during one year through March 2026, a 38 percent increase compared with the previous year, making Sudanese among the leading asylum seekers in Britain.

Bitsarakis argued that additional sources of weapons, money, or technical support contribute to the risk of prolonging a conflict that has already produced one of the world's worst humanitarian crises. He said that more weapons could extend the war, potentially forcing more civilians to leave their homes and placing additional pressure on Sudan's neighbors and migration routes toward Europe.

The Independent's editorial raised questions about the upcoming first meeting between President Donald Trump and new British Prime Minister Andy Burnham this month, coinciding with the UN General Assembly starting September 22. The newspaper recalled Trump's statement that American support for British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands is under review, and interpreted this as leverage to pressure Britain into increased military spending.

The Independent said Burnham must understand that maintaining good relations with the United States remains in Britain's national interest over the long term, despite the difficulty of predicting Trump's moves. The newspaper noted that Prime Minister Keir Starmer's approach had succeeded for some time in protecting Britons from what it called Trump's "worst volatile tariffs."

British newspapers debate Israeli settlements, Sudan's migration crisis, and Trump | Middle East Affairs